Ron Pope Fireflies Piano Sheet Music

FEELINGS THE LORD OF THE RING

not usually make comments or posts on achievers in sport, but today I'm going to permit an exception, I think extremely well deserved. In my younger years I was very closely linked to both play basketball, and in support work in one of the clubs in the late 80's - when basketball was a big explosion and popularity in Spain was part of the most media .

remember my first trip to the United States and the fascination of going to see live!! my first match the NBA. Everything was spectacular and magnificent, has not been erased from my retina that image was the time when Europeans began to make their first steps in a team no pointers, and always as a substitute, at best, in some cases as the sixth man team. We remember the first English landfall in the American Basketball League - Fernando Martin, and now after 23 years of this milestone, Pau Gasol has become our "lord of the ring" of the NBA, could say many things about the race Pau Gasol, but something to highlight on the other, is apart from his pride, desire to excel, commitment to its objectives and challenges, and a great discipline, great design of his career and the consistency of it. This has made each step has been slowly climbing, having guaranteed to reach the top. That's why our "Lord of the Ring."

Here we are not yet aware of the importance that Americans have the rings, most of them carry some in your fingers with some symbolism. The most popular are those of the NBA, NFL, PGA etc., All worn with pride and satisfaction shown by our English society is not very "anillera" in this case, but appreciate the ring, at least what we value means and especially because it belongs to a English man who was almost asking permission to be a hole, and today is considered the turning point for a team without an identity and a great eccentric star has become a winning team under the guidance, yes, a great coach.

Letter Head For Community Service

ASOCIAL

has always amazed me the name of "social dialogue", as usual is usually that there is no dialogue and certainly is at least debatable whether social.Repasemos first of all the parties who are usually involved at all I want to disqualify the members, but let me doubt that now the participants have a clear awareness of the needs social. Unions have a mission and difficult ballot, since its survival is at stake, have failed or may have been adapting to new rules of society, much less to economic downturns and labor, their situation is precarious and if not by state aid, surely today its existence is residual, therefore have a weak position in any movement toward a loss of traditional employment rights would be interpreted by his dwindling supporters as a retreat inaceptable.La employer represented by CEOE, is the sum of many interests, it is sufficient fluctuations recent internal review to see that a common position and united is not easy, on the other hand the structure of the labor issues have been very capitidisminuidos other economic interests and relations with power. Government of the nation, not much to say, is governed to decide and if some do not agree it is the mission of making decisions that help companies and workers (self-employed or employees) to enjoy a good employment situation, what else is dereliction of duties. I've heard this week two former presidents Expomanagement the English government of different political, speak the same terms as labor reform. We wonder why them their mandate did not go beyond the reforms when we were all aware that it was necessary, or do perhaps is that the partners were not aware of it because they had other interests that prevented them from view?. We need urgent and profound changes, there is more dialogue social that society needs, and forget the spurious interests that each party may have, but we do so, we will be leaving the situation is worse with each passing day and we can afford the five million unemployed back to the corner.

(published in blog TT HRS)

Commercial Wire Rabbit Cages

MONOLOGUE "OF VENTURE CAPITAL RISK CAPITAL"

One of the things that have least discussed during this crisis, has been without doubt the role of the companies - I can hardly call them "venture capital companies. In my experience I have to recognize these companies are many positive aspects. They highlight the enormous changes that have resulted in many companies with entry into the capital in each of these shareholders (change in management model to support the internationalization of the company, improving processes, increase organizational skills and other many). There have been many companies - many of them family owned, which would not have survived had it not been for the emergence of private equity in the shareholding and management of them. On the other hand, Venture Capital companies among its teams cherish people with great talent and professionalism can themselves often be at the forefront of leading companies and achieve great things.

The question I ask myself, and it is not easy to answer is: What will be the role of Risk Capiptal remainder of crisis? and when it begins to recall what is going to be a venture capital companies?. A few months ago I read an article in a famous U.S. magazine that asked something similar, but linking it to the arrival at the White House Barack H. Obama. The columnist concluded by saying that there will be many regulatory changes for private equity because more of the trusted men of the new president of its Chicago environment have been linked or are linked to these companies.

venture capital firms generally have to raise its investments as follows: I give up my capital for the development of a company that in principle is viability and growth and for that assignment (usually limited in time) I will pick up some earnings estimates for a certain amount - albeit tied to company performance, "in times of economic boom the game are clear and usually everyone just getting some extent its objectives (the company grows and gets results, more professionalized, the internationalization where appropriate, and venture capital gets his profit.) But some problems in the past has been that sometimes the results have not been sufficient to meet venture capital firms and this leads to discrepancies in the model, the private equity are required to report to people who have "banked" their capital returns lower than expected. Many times he has given money to these companies do not know where it is invested and thus expects that those promises of benefits for the assets transferred is the one that in its day negotiated. This complicated three-way relationship strength to some extent venture capital companies to "force" companies to achieve results at times in the short term results and even undermine their viability in the medium or long. I believe that private equity could make some minor changes that surely help now and in future also have a more stable economic environment and certainly more predictable. I can think of among others the following:

- Increased transparency from private equity investors and their capital where they go.

- Increasing involvement of company executives Venture capital operations and daily operations of enterprises.

- Increased attention to the vagaries of the sectors where they operate and long-term view of investments.

There will be many more, but eventually tries to put a little more down to earth business in which it operates, I am sure that with the talent that exists in these organizations will make those changes necessary for the improved performance of the companies where they are present and as a result of investors they represent.

Wrestlingshop Sale 50%

INTERNATIONALISATION OF SPANISH FIRMS

This week I attended two meetings which were directly related to the business interanalización españolas.Uno of these was the presentation of the First Annual Report of the Observatory of English Multinational Companies (OEME) by ESADE Business School and ICEX and with the collaboration of the Fundación Cultural Banesto and PriceWaterhouseCoopers. Under the pompous title of "The English Multinational Expansion: Strategies and Organizational Change" includes an interesting analysis of different areas of the current situation of enterprises. It is a fundamental aspect of our economy that multinational English companies to develop business outside of our country, as this will greatly help us to overcome or mitigate the effects of the economic crisis we are experiencing. Some data from the study are clearly revealing so important progress has taken place. Notes that Spain has been the 7 th in the world for investment outside its borders in the past three years as opposed to this light is the fact of the excessive financing to get this post have had to deal with companies and certainly we can pass some small bills at the moment. On the other hand, there are 2,000 companies that may be considered multinational, that it seems one more than respectable, but the reality or the shadow is that the criterion is to have at least one subsidiary outside the borders are controlled, through subsidiaries of these companies is 3 subsidiaries with what we're talking about an environment of 6,000 subsidiaries outside our borders. The mean number of subsidiaries whose parent companies are in developed countries is about 10 or so, with what we can deduce that we still have far to go in order to have at least some 20,000 branches. On the other hand, if we eliminate from the list of top 20, probably the picture would be somewhat less optimistic, and we would find that there is a substantial number of the 2,000 companies listed above have an almost testimonial one or at most two filiales.Por Finally, the challenges facing the expansion of English multinationals beyond our borders are, apart from the funding that we have said, is change their organizational structures and get to be strictly multinationals can change the process of organizational learning with higher contribution from subsidiaries to headquarters, the need to continue the process to avoid losing market positions in the coming years and last and certainly the most important, least in my opinion, talent management and the internationalization of managerial staff mainly in corporate centers. This coincides with the second forum where more restricted to professional Human Resources function and where a significant number of English majors pointed that the most important challenges facing their departments are essentially the talent management identifying youth with potential, managing diversity outside the creation of an identity corporativa.Como see, major challenges will undoubtedly make our organizations to achieve the objectives proposed and a great opportunity also for internationalization of their own human resources function.